<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Curse of the Broken Feed</title>
	<link>http://www.burstblog.com/2006/06/01/the-curse-of-the-broken-feed/</link>
	<description>The Official BlogBurst Blog!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Broken Feeds &#187; Technology, Blogging and Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.burstblog.com/2006/06/01/the-curse-of-the-broken-feed/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Broken Feeds &#187; Technology, Blogging and Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.burstblog.com/2006/06/01/the-curse-of-the-broken-feed/#comment-717</guid>
		<description>[...] As a thanks to them for accepting me, and as a public service announcement to so many people who use API tools or other HTML editor including Microsoft Word, they have provided a much more patient explanation for why feeds (and even sites) break when using these tools. Check it out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] As a thanks to them for accepting me, and as a public service announcement to so many people who use API tools or other HTML editor including Microsoft Word, they have provided a much more patient explanation for why feeds (and even sites) break when using these tools. Check it out. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gmo</title>
		<link>http://www.burstblog.com/2006/06/01/the-curse-of-the-broken-feed/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Gmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 22:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.burstblog.com/2006/06/01/the-curse-of-the-broken-feed/#comment-553</guid>
		<description>I have validated the RSS but still not getting the feed to be filled and sent to Blogburst.  It's an empty RSS file 
http://www.getusb.info/?feed=rss2
I'm working with wordpress and checked all the options within the admin panel - any suggestions would be greatly appreciated and tried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have validated the RSS but still not getting the feed to be filled and sent to Blogburst.  It&#8217;s an empty RSS file<br />
<a href="http://www.getusb.info/?feed=rss2" rel="nofollow">http://www.getusb.info/?feed=rss2</a><br />
I&#8217;m working with wordpress and checked all the options within the admin panel - any suggestions would be greatly appreciated and tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Woodman</title>
		<link>http://www.burstblog.com/2006/06/01/the-curse-of-the-broken-feed/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Woodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.burstblog.com/2006/06/01/the-curse-of-the-broken-feed/#comment-476</guid>
		<description>Agreed that RSS 2.0 is a guideline.  Just watch the RSS Board gyrations as they try to squeeze out a tighter spec.  Since Dave Winer doesn't want a tighter spec, it will probably never happen.

Atom 1.0 has a very clear spec, however.  In my view, anybody who treats it as a guideline is just being sloppy.  Or is there some area of ambiguity that you have in mind?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed that RSS 2.0 is a guideline.  Just watch the RSS Board gyrations as they try to squeeze out a tighter spec.  Since Dave Winer doesn&#8217;t want a tighter spec, it will probably never happen.</p>
<p>Atom 1.0 has a very clear spec, however.  In my view, anybody who treats it as a guideline is just being sloppy.  Or is there some area of ambiguity that you have in mind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
