<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Sense of Your Google Page Rank</title>
	<link>http://www.burstblog.com/2007/10/31/making-sense-of-your-google-page-rank/</link>
	<description>The Official BlogBurst Blog!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pagerank Seo</title>
		<link>http://www.burstblog.com/2007/10/31/making-sense-of-your-google-page-rank/#comment-100341</link>
		<dc:creator>Pagerank Seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.burstblog.com/2007/10/31/making-sense-of-your-google-page-rank/#comment-100341</guid>
		<description>Googles new policy is good and bad if they want to truely crack down on pr link sellers they should themselves Yahoo and MSN as well who actually started the sell a link boom. But I dont see any of them losing their PR 10 standings.

The good in all this is that alot of junk directories will get erased finally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Googles new policy is good and bad if they want to truely crack down on pr link sellers they should themselves Yahoo and MSN as well who actually started the sell a link boom. But I dont see any of them losing their PR 10 standings.</p>
<p>The good in all this is that alot of junk directories will get erased finally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
